In all fairness, North East Hampshire is one of the safest Tory seats in the UK, so I'm not sure you'd be helping Miliband much Peter, even if you voted LabourEuler wrote: I just don't see how that would change under a new Labour government. They just don't seem to get it. REd Milliband's mantra appears to be that they just got it a bit wrong in the past and he wants to try again. Not on my shift!
2015 UK General Election
Farage has unbelievable moral courage. Almost single-handedly he has stood up to all that the left wing media can throw at him since 1997..(imagine that) and has not buckled. I sincerly hope he gets his reward and UKIP get a handful of seats to help the Cons form a government based on a strong economy. Without that there is no 'social welfare' for the public sector!
For sheer moral courage and speaking his mind Farage compares with all our truly great leaders. Totally agree with Euler that labour will bankrupt the country this time around..they tried hard enough before!!
For sheer moral courage and speaking his mind Farage compares with all our truly great leaders. Totally agree with Euler that labour will bankrupt the country this time around..they tried hard enough before!!
I realise that, there is almost no point in me voting, but I can bleat on about it on the internet.LeTiss 4pm wrote:In all fairness, North East Hampshire is one of the safest Tory seats in the UK, so I'm not sure you'd be helping Miliband much Peter, even if you voted Labour
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
I guess I'm a similar age but I don't remember feeling hopeless or in the slightest bit bothered that we were poor. Yes, financially Britain was a basket case, but on the plus side we weren't overcrowded, the was a real sense of British identity, you could buy a house for a 300 quid and people weren't up to their necks in debt. Money isn't everything.Euler wrote:My earliest memories as a child were the mid 70's, it was a disaster. I remember cleaning my teeth with what little toothpaste we had and the lights going out regularly. I think people have forgotten just how bad things were, but that shaped my life view forever TBH. I remember just how poor my family was and how hopeless everything looked. Yet Labour was supposed to be helping the working class? There had to be a better way and personal responsibility seemed to be it for me.
Euler wrote:My earliest memories as a child were the mid 70's, it was a disaster. I remember cleaning my teeth with what little toothpaste we had and the lights going out regularly. I think people have forgotten just how bad things were, but that shaped my life view forever TBH. I remember just how poor my family was and how hopeless everything looked. Yet Labour was supposed to be helping the working class? There had to be a better way and personal responsibility seemed to be it for me.
When Labour came back into power in 1997 I knew it would be all about tax and spend. That didn't fit comfortably with my mantra of saving during the good times, it was inevitable that it would end badly and it did. I just don't see how that would change under a new Labour government. They just don't seem to get it. REd Milliband's mantra appears to be that they just got it a bit wrong in the past and he wants to try again. Not on my shift!
Reading between the lines.....Euler is voting Conservative, superfrank is voting UKIPsuperfrank wrote: I guess I'm a similar age but I don't remember feeling hopeless or in the slightest bit bothered that we were poor. Yes, financially Britain was a basket case, but on the plus side we weren't overcrowded, the was a real sense of British identity, you could buy a house for a 300 quid and people weren't up to their necks in debt. Money isn't everything.
Monitoring the markets they are discounting a 20% chance that Ed was lying when he said he wouldn't offer SNP a seat in a new cabinet. Will be interesting to see if that happens, wouldn't be a particular good start to the next term.
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
that was a good lay, back out to 17 now.LeTiss 4pm wrote:There's some strange anomalies going on
UKIP's price for winning no seats has shortened quite a bit from 21 to 9.8, yet Farage to win Thanet South is still trading comfortably at 1.70
Carswell should be nailed on in Clacton. Reckless looks like losing (he's a bit drab) so should be 2 for UKIP. Farage PM and Carswell chancellor!
Their price for winning 1-5 seats has drifted though.superfrank wrote:that was a good lay, back out to 17 now.LeTiss 4pm wrote:There's some strange anomalies going on
UKIP's price for winning no seats has shortened quite a bit from 21 to 9.8, yet Farage to win Thanet South is still trading comfortably at 1.70
Carswell should be nailed on in Clacton. Reckless looks like losing (he's a bit drab) so should be 2 for UKIP. Farage PM and Carswell chancellor!
Their prices for winning 0 seats and winning over 5 have shortened!
That seems a bit odd to me
- superfrank
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:28 pm
a '92 scenario could still happen if enough have got scared by the thought of a proper(ish) left-wing govt.
exit polls were spot on last time, not long now.
exit polls were spot on last time, not long now.