Hi
just a thought..
If we had a tool (like Guardian, or MarketOverview) called charge elimitator. On it a ladder interface connected to 2 exchanges: bf and BETDAQ. however on the backside we would have bf and on layside betdaq.
when the conditions are right we place a back bet on bf and a lay bet on betdaq at the same odds if possible. Stats are saying that backing favorites you end up loosing. But anyway we endup generating more comision, and pumping money to betdaq markets and giving them a share of commision too. the trick is to lift the losses on the betfair side...
cheers
Premium charge a year on
?? If you pay your mate 50% of the profit, That would make you worse of than paying betfair 20%.?Bet Angel wrote:Be careful if you get other people involved in your betting activity as the IR may classify that as organised activity and you will have to pay tax.
Cheers
Jimmy
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Yeah should be - just waiting on getting my weekly statement should be here in the next hour.
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Just got my statement and it looks like they are still only looking at the 60 weeks????
Can't claim to have the PhD in Premium Charge that you need these days when using Betfair perhaps someone who knows a bit more about it could shed some light, Peter?
Can't claim to have the PhD in Premium Charge that you need these days when using Betfair perhaps someone who knows a bit more about it could shed some light, Peter?
I would assume the start date is the 12th, meaning it won't be til next week your statement will be different.
My question, if anybody knows in advance, will be if they assume that everybody paid 20%, then traders will be better off if trading from before the introduction, as instead of that period paying 5% or so commission, you were seen to be paying 20%.
But, for people such as myself that are not sole traders, if they set that to 20%, as opposed to the 100% or so that I guess I have averaged over the life of my account, then I will be far worse off?
Surely it will be a calc that if under 20%, set it to 20%, otherwise, keep original?
My question, if anybody knows in advance, will be if they assume that everybody paid 20%, then traders will be better off if trading from before the introduction, as instead of that period paying 5% or so commission, you were seen to be paying 20%.
But, for people such as myself that are not sole traders, if they set that to 20%, as opposed to the 100% or so that I guess I have averaged over the life of my account, then I will be far worse off?
Surely it will be a calc that if under 20%, set it to 20%, otherwise, keep original?
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Thats how I understand it, it brings those of us running under 20% up to 20% but if you were above 20% say, 67% you stay at 67%, but as I say I don't have the Premium Charge PhD that is neededBrent wrote:Surely it will be a calc that if under 20%, set it to 20%, otherwise, keep original?
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Yeah I think you are right the change didn't happen until Monday so it is next weeks statement that takes the life of the account into affect, my mistake!Brent wrote:I would assume the start date is the 12th, meaning it won't be til next week your statement will be different.
-
- Posts: 4619
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:23 pm
Statements are on the portal for the first PC since the changes. Mine seems to be worse for me
Mines great .I have paid 46.88% commission and got my £1000 allowance back.
46.88 % should keep me out of the PC for a while .It has saved me just under £100 today which is a bit of a bonus.
It would be nice to get a rebate of the pc I have already paid.
46.88 % should keep me out of the PC for a while .It has saved me just under £100 today which is a bit of a bonus.
It would be nice to get a rebate of the pc I have already paid.