U.S Open 2013
Djokovic backhand the key according to IBM data crunchers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23979080
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23979080
BJ> yes, agree that sounds important. But also important how pants will Jock's service be - and how nails can Nadal be to push through his knee pain
Starting prices are Nadal shorter on 1.7 ish and Jock on 2.3ish. Best strategy I'd say is lay Nadal on 1.7 and do the same when (if) Jock comes in for a 15% return on risked capital
If it all goes Nadal's way then it will be obvious and laying off Jock on 5.0 should be fine
Starting prices are Nadal shorter on 1.7 ish and Jock on 2.3ish. Best strategy I'd say is lay Nadal on 1.7 and do the same when (if) Jock comes in for a 15% return on risked capital
If it all goes Nadal's way then it will be obvious and laying off Jock on 5.0 should be fine
The match is priced almost perfectly for a high variable and tradeable match. At the start price the average drift on Nadal is the most variable of all matches. So it looks a really nice set up.
I can't trade this evening, wedding anniversary!
I can't trade this evening, wedding anniversary!
Match worked a charm for the double layers out there. Nadal drifed way past 2.5 before tightening in
A good tourney for trading.
Out of interest, did anyone use betdaq for their trades? I wonder how in the major tourneys it is going over in Purple Land, because the liquidity on the major US Open matches was as solid as ever on betfair
A good tourney for trading.
Out of interest, did anyone use betdaq for their trades? I wonder how in the major tourneys it is going over in Purple Land, because the liquidity on the major US Open matches was as solid as ever on betfair