I wouldn't worry about it mate, Jeremy Vine is looking at you and thinking he should have taken up trading
BBC Pay
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Although it's pretty questionable; these presenters must be generating huge incomes for the BBC; or it simply wouldn't be economically viable to pay them these kind of wages.
It's also why a good trader will earn more than a good nurse. The economic benefit a good trader provides to the punters, beats the economic benefit a nurse provides to a patient. Whether it should be like that is up for debate, but that's how the economy works
It's also why a good trader will earn more than a good nurse. The economic benefit a good trader provides to the punters, beats the economic benefit a nurse provides to a patient. Whether it should be like that is up for debate, but that's how the economy works
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
Everyone should earn the same regardless of profession.
I'll get my coat.
I'll get my coat.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:54 pm
The BBC is fantastic value for money, it's also a British institution that holds sway and sets standards on a global level. I'm not quite sure what the news story is with regarding what employees are paid, apart from the gender pay gap which is an issue generally in society - not specifically the BBC. Some really good talent is also acquired by the BBC on a long term basis at under the market rate - which is another reason why it is such good value.
Is that you Gary?vankancisco wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:45 amThe BBC is fantastic value for money, it's also a British institution that holds sway and sets standards on a global level. I'm not quite sure what the news story is with regarding what employees are paid, apart from the gender pay gap which is an issue generally in society - not specifically the BBC. Some really good talent is also acquired by the BBC on a long term basis at under the market rate - which is another reason why it is such good value.
And the BBC are the first to slag anyone off yet somehow women who do the same job and are equally as good get paid half as much!
It Turns Out Britain’s Biggest TV Names Are Underpaid
European and U.S. TV personalities earn considerably more than those on the BBC.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
European and U.S. TV personalities earn considerably more than those on the BBC.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
- BetScalper
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 10:47 pm
Probably but the US certainly doesn't have a fee paying licence.Euler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 22, 2017 8:46 amIt Turns Out Britain’s Biggest TV Names Are Underpaid
European and U.S. TV personalities earn considerably more than those on the BBC.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium=social
When I lived in Spain for awhile, we had all the BBC channels and never paid a separate licence fee for them.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:54 pm
Comcast hold a virtually monopoly in the US, some of the bills for a cable TV package can be astronomical. It's a strong reminder of why the BBC is such a fantastic institution, and fantastic value - all for £3 per week