Well it's good he hasn't been given a break; cos your post is f4ckin' solidShaunWhite wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2019 4:51 pmGive the guy a break ffs
btw KL, adding 10p to 17 winners is sometimes easier than adding 50p to 3 losers. Most advice you'll see says look at the losers first but that's illogcal imo. Making a big difference to a small set of results often isn't as effective as making a small difference to a large set of results. Afterall you're doing automation, automation is all about scale and fixing a few outliers isn't always the answer.
It also the case that you can sometimes make a bot more profitable by making it LESS profitable per race. If you reduce it's individual race effectiveness by 10%, but that means it trades twice as many scenarios, then that's better than a strategy that makes 100% greens but only does so 3 times a day.
That's golden that one, really like it
