peter, you disappoint . *Seems like a lot of work for the developers...*. whilst i agree that there are many markets every day, tweaking rules live is only for the faint hearted - been there, not advisable.workpeter wrote:Not sure how trading on past markets with simulated money is any better than trading on live markets with simulated money. Seems like a lot of work for the developers to give you no real benefit. Thing is, there are so many races every day, so plenty of opportunity to practice. When the markets close, spend time analyzing your data.
for any product that evolves and becomes a world class leader (as BA undoubtedly has), work has to be done. not all of that work has immediate quantifiable benefit. for any product that is seriously presenting a rules based engine, a backtesting facility is a must (it's the same with any software platform. loadtesting, integration testing etc - all are key facets required in order to support the extension of features). for any product that wants to compete with other rules based applications (i won't of course mention what that product is called), it must look out to see if competition exists within that domain and see if there's a way to grab some of those customers who may use product B due to that particular offering.
peter, i know this is a pretty polarised topic and it's obvious where i stand on things but as i suggested in a previous post, there are simple(r) ways to allow a test market to be statically linked to the application via an editable xml file which the end user could use as-is or if more savvy, could edit to simulate a previous market condition. i'd be more than happy to lessen the developer workload by proposing that as a halfway house. that way, one half of the divide gets something to work with, the other half can safely ignore it.