Newcastle AW

The sport of kings.
Post Reply
User avatar
wearthefoxhat
Posts: 3220
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am

stueytrader wrote:
Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:46 pm
Can anyone make any sense of this track for trading (and/or punting)?

Moves just seem to have no relation to anything from my analysis. :?
Newcastle AW
Mid-High draw preferable for 5f, 6f,7f races.

An angle could be looking for something with fair early pace for a B2L approach, conversely, those low drawn, L2B.
User avatar
Naffman
Posts: 5639
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:46 am

Newcastle seems to be a very hard surface too, horses that like a bit of cut there will struggle massively
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2094
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

wearthefoxhat wrote:
Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:39 pm
Newcastle AW
Mid-High draw preferable for 5f, 6f,7f races.

An angle could be looking for something with fair early pace for a B2L approach, conversely, those low drawn, L2B.
That's an interesting shout, certainly one for the notebook :)
stueytrader
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 pm

Thanks all for the very interesting replies.

It was just that I've always found Newcastle to be the track that is most likely to show heavy moves, which have no relation to the actual races run after the pre-market. Though that may just be in my sample (which is not complete).

It is an interesting question I believe, which become our favourite/least favourite tracks to play, and why that may be.
stueytrader
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 pm

wearthefoxhat wrote:
Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:39 pm
stueytrader wrote:
Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:46 pm
Can anyone make any sense of this track for trading (and/or punting)?

Moves just seem to have no relation to anything from my analysis. :?
Newcastle AW
Mid-High draw preferable for 5f, 6f,7f races.

An angle could be looking for something with fair early pace for a B2L approach, conversely, those low drawn, L2B.
Thanks for the ideas there, I would roughly agree with some of that in general - my problem is that I'm not really an inplay trader personally, though I agree there may be some ideas in that respect.

The odd thing I've found (as my above post) is that sometimes those that look like inplay BTLs, which I feel should shorten pre, actually drift heavy pre and then possibly shorten only when inplay - which for a pre-trader taking a loss can be rather frustrating!
elofan0
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:44 pm

one of the good things about newcastle is its one of the four tracks that record sectional times in their results :)
as seen in this example on at the races past result of one of todays runners mambo dancer
http://www.attheraces.com/form-popup/ra ... id=1064588
bobs71
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 10:22 pm

Newcastle is quite unique in the All weather world in that it is the only AW track that has a straight mile. That mile is quite testing , and rises around 31 feet from start to the finish line , with the majority of that incline (21 ft) coming between 3f out and the finishing line.
Newcastle straight.JPG
That uphill finish has a slowing effect on the times and last furlong sectionals are comparable only to Southwell (which has the slowest final sectionals of all AW tracks) - The other variable the track is prone to due to situation is wind , particularly strong westerly winds which blow right down the home straight into the faces of the runners. The clerk of the course James Armstrong is a decent guy (also covers Hexham over the jumps) and responds to any questions about the track through email or on twitter and usually posts up decent info about the tracked being worked on , wind speeds (he takes them with an anemometer) etc. The surface Tapeta is generally a fair compound but can tighten up over the winter and this can also have an effect on the times.
The track is not as front runner friendly as say Chelmsford or Southwell , and you see a lot of finishes decided well inside the last furlong.
Runstyle data / Std Final / Sectional Times attached
Newcastle Runstyle.PNG
Std Times.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
bobs71
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 10:22 pm

One thing worth knowing about the track seeing that it shares the "same" surface as Wolverhampton - Tapeta
Horses running at Newcastle whose last race at Wolverhampton have a horrible record compared to the other AW tracks - punters might assume some correlation in surface type but historically since the track opened it is not there and if anything the reverse is true - they win as a group just over 8% and only Southwell is worse (Fibresand) - the reason for this is probably that the manufacturers of Tapeta (created by ex-trainer Michael Dickinson)are continually improving / upgrading the compound , so no two track layings are alike - Wolverhampton was done in 2014 and Newcastle in 2016. Whether this continues remains to be seen , although the chi-score is high enough in significance to believe it will.
Newcastle AW by Last race.PNG
The other thing is that Newmarket trained horses have a significant record at the track and a higher than average win , win/place % - considering the distance and round trip they have to travel. They win as a group around 20% of the time from a decent sample size and only lose around 3% to BFSP
Newcastle - Newmarket trained horses.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
wearthefoxhat
Posts: 3220
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:55 am

bobs71 wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:39 pm
Newcastle is quite unique in the All weather world in that it is the only AW track that has a straight mile. That mile is quite testing , and rises around 31 feet from start to the finish line , with the majority of that incline (21 ft) coming between 3f out and the finishing line.Newcastle straight.JPG That uphill finish has a slowing effect on the times and last furlong sectionals are comparable only to Southwell (which has the slowest final sectionals of all AW tracks) - The other variable the track is prone to due to situation is wind , particularly strong westerly winds which blow right down the home straight into the faces of the runners. The clerk of the course James Armstrong is a decent guy (also covers Hexham over the jumps) and responds to any questions about the track through email or on twitter and usually posts up decent info about the tracked being worked on , wind speeds (he takes them with an anemometer) etc. The surface Tapeta is generally a fair compound but can tighten up over the winter and this can also have an effect on the times.
The track is not as front runner friendly as say Chelmsford or Southwell , and you see a lot of finishes decided well inside the last furlong.
Runstyle data / Std Final / Sectional Times attachedNewcastle Runstyle.PNGStd Times.PNG
Nice info bobs71!
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2094
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

I have to say Newcastle is interesting (I wish I knew why #reversible-losers)

Really does stick like a sore thumb on this strategy.

& as a bonus, the fact Windsor's top, almost certainly means it's correlated to one of Peter's strategies :D
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

ruthlessimon wrote:
Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:03 pm
I have to say Newcastle is interesting (I wish I knew why #reversible-losers)
You've got a "Newc" and a "Newcastle" in there Simon, makes it even more of a standout when they're summed.
Are these scaled according to how many races there were?
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

ditto Leic and Leicester, Kemp and Kempton, Wolv and Wolverhampton too....and Wind and Windsor.
I think you need and alphabetic sort first to get rid of the wrinkles.

Ling and Lingfield, Bri and Brighton.........is it deliberate?
Last edited by ShaunWhite on Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ruthlessimon
Posts: 2094
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm

ShaunWhite wrote:
Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:08 pm
You've got a "Newc" and a "Newcastle" in there Simon, makes it even more of a standout when they're summed.
Are these scaled according to how many races there were?
yeah I just noticed that too, similarly Windsor gets a boost. This is gonna take some grunt work to clean :roll: (a problem due to holes in the data.. ;) )

That's a good shout, I'll add that metric - watch dis space
User avatar
ShaunWhite
Posts: 9731
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am

ruthlessimon wrote:
Mon Oct 29, 2018 5:14 pm
This is gonna take some grunt work to clean :roll: (a problem due to holes in the data.. ;) )
Make sure you record all those find/replaces as a big fat macro....it can go in your data scrubbing toolbox then.
User avatar
SeaHorseRacing
Posts: 2893
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 7:06 pm

bobs71 wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:39 pm
Newcastle is quite unique in the All weather world in that it is the only AW track that has a straight mile. That mile is quite testing , and rises around 31 feet from start to the finish line , with the majority of that incline (21 ft) coming between 3f out and the finishing line.Newcastle straight.JPG That uphill finish has a slowing effect on the times and last furlong sectionals are comparable only to Southwell (which has the slowest final sectionals of all AW tracks) - The other variable the track is prone to due to situation is wind , particularly strong westerly winds which blow right down the home straight into the faces of the runners. The clerk of the course James Armstrong is a decent guy (also covers Hexham over the jumps) and responds to any questions about the track through email or on twitter and usually posts up decent info about the tracked being worked on , wind speeds (he takes them with an anemometer) etc. The surface Tapeta is generally a fair compound but can tighten up over the winter and this can also have an effect on the times.
The track is not as front runner friendly as say Chelmsford or Southwell , and you see a lot of finishes decided well inside the last furlong.
Runstyle data / Std Final / Sectional Times attachedNewcastle Runstyle.PNGStd Times.PNG
How are you working out the increase in height in the track? Additionally, would love to have a go and doing so at other tracks.
Post Reply

Return to “Trading Horse racing”