Or 4...How about measuring it with "predictive tick size"? ....ie work out your amount per tick from the closing price band rather than the opening one? Could be b*ll*cks but I know you like your alternative methods. I still think the best thing is to remove the whole issue of step sizes and stakes and go for a %age.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:44 pmI thought I might as well knock up what those three techniques look like
Today's Horse Racing
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Umm yeh.. I'll have to try get my head around that oneShaunWhite wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:31 pmOr 4...How about measuring it with "predictive tick size"? ....ie work out your amount per tick from the closing price band rather than the opening one? Could be b*ll*cks but I know you like your alternative methods. I still think the best thing is to remove the whole issue of step sizes and stakes and go for a %age.
you guys need to exchange skype contact detailsruthlessimon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:50 pmUmm yeh.. I'll have to try get my head around that oneShaunWhite wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:31 pmOr 4...How about measuring it with "predictive tick size"? ....ie work out your amount per tick from the closing price band rather than the opening one? Could be b*ll*cks but I know you like your alternative methods. I still think the best thing is to remove the whole issue of step sizes and stakes and go for a %age.
Some terrible field sizes tomorrow, Doncaster in particular with 3 x 3 runner races and the largest field being 7 runners and that is all before any late withdrawals, chuck in 15 minute gaps after each Cheltenham race and it is looking very uninspiring.
-
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:06 pm
+1jimibt wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:58 pmyou guys need to exchange skype contact detailsruthlessimon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:50 pmUmm yeh.. I'll have to try get my head around that oneShaunWhite wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:31 pmOr 4...How about measuring it with "predictive tick size"? ....ie work out your amount per tick from the closing price band rather than the opening one? Could be b*ll*cks but I know you like your alternative methods. I still think the best thing is to remove the whole issue of step sizes and stakes and go for a %age.
All the data is there if you want to assess it by another method. Displaying it to £100 is just the simplest, I doubt Euler has some devious motive for doing it otherwise .
- ruthlessimon
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 3:54 pm
Well he's only got himself to blame!spreadbetting wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:24 pmI doubt Euler has some devious motive for doing it otherwise .
If you promote a contrarian ideology - you gotta expect people to refute every bit of mainstream advice given !!
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
I thought I remembered that 'challenge everything' message from somewhere.ruthlessimon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:22 pmIf you promote a contrarian ideology - you gotta expect people to refute every bit of mainstream advice given !!
I found this nice twist on it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:13 pm
must be beginners luck for me, coz ive had my best afternoon so far..lol
Everybody trades in a slight different way so that's great.mambapeter wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 3:49 pmmust be beginners luck for me, coz ive had my best afternoon so far..lol
Today looks a similar set up, so my expectations are low. But hope you have a good day again today.