baf file help??
Cant get the second third fourth bets to trigger and fire can anyone take a look and tell me where im going wrong.. Iv asked a few times yet nobody has answered. The file is below
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
Did you try what I suggested about setting the signal before trying to increment it?
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
I think this is the problem... s/b Avoid2 not set set. ?
Ditto the others
Ditto the others
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Try this if your unable to get yours to work
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=12743
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=12743
sorry mate i dont understand what you mean, can you elaborate further??ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:03 pmI think this is the problem... s/b Avoid2 not set set. ?
Ditto the others
thanks for the reply mate.. thats simular to what im trying to do but i want to double the stakes up on the next runner or runners that drop below 2.. the first £2 pound lay is working but not the second(£4) third(£8) etc.. this is the fileDallas wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:06 pmTry this if your unable to get yours to work
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=12743
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
You are trying to back the second shortie BUT checking that Avoid1 isn't set.
If you want to back #2 then you need to check Avoid2 isn't set instead?
So, first horse gets backed, Counter gets set to 1 and Avoid 1 gets set. - Correct.
... 2nd horse shortens.. Rule #2 gets checked, counter is correct (ie 1) BUT Avoid1 is being checked, it was set above, so rule #2 doesn't fire.
If you want to back #2 then you need to check Avoid2 isn't set instead?
So, first horse gets backed, Counter gets set to 1 and Avoid 1 gets set. - Correct.
... 2nd horse shortens.. Rule #2 gets checked, counter is correct (ie 1) BUT Avoid1 is being checked, it was set above, so rule #2 doesn't fire.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
This should be "Avoid2" not "Avoid1"
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ill leave this in Shauns capable hands as he had already responded while i was looking for the link and he's seen your actual file where as ive closed BA down for the night so he'll be best to adviseferrypaul wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:18 pmthanks for the reply mate.. thats simular to what im trying to do but i want to double the stakes up on the next runner or runners that drop below 2.. the first £2 pound lay is working but not the second(£4) third(£8) etc.. this is the fileBack when a horse hits 2.bafDallas wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:06 pmTry this if your unable to get yours to work
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=12743
thanks for this mate,, what about the rest of the avoids on the other rules are they ok?
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
No, they're all wrong in the same way.
You are setting the Avoid signal when the bet is placed on a selection, so when the rules cycle round again, you want the rule to fire if it's coresponding Avoid signal is NOT already set.
You are setting the Avoid signal when the bet is placed on a selection, so when the rules cycle round again, you want the rule to fire if it's coresponding Avoid signal is NOT already set.
So the second rule should be avoid 2 should the third rule be avoid 3 and the fourth rule avoid 4 etc??ShaunWhite wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:17 amNo, they're all wrong in the same way.
You are setting the Avoid signal when the bet is placed on a selection, so when the rules cycle round again, you want the rule to fire if it's coresponding Avoid signal is NOT already set.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
If the change to rule #2 worked, then yes.
I'm not running this btw I'm just stepping thru the logic, so take care running these suggestions.
I'm not running this btw I'm just stepping thru the logic, so take care running these suggestions.
iv tried the adjustments mate and its just putting all the bets in at the same time at the start of the raceShaunWhite wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:21 amIf the change to rule #2 worked, then yes.
I'm not running this btw I'm just stepping thru the logic, so take care running these suggestions.