you may well have a valid point that i did not even consider at the time,
i know that if the trade had worked completely in Boliteli's favor i would have netted nearly £3800, but i don't get carried away with those sort of figures
i enter the trade for a specific reason and i get out for a specific reason.
French Open 2018 Roland Garros
I'm talking off the top of my head (or perhaps through my arse - I'm on the booze) but laying at 25 equates to backing at 1.04167, so I think the money laid at 1.04 (which took his closing trade) may not have matched his 25 back bet until it's all gone. In essence, the money would have been at the front of the 1.05 queue.northbound wrote: ↑Mon May 28, 2018 10:55 pmWell done Tom, I do similar trades on tennis and have a question.
Considering that cross matching is enabled on tennis markets, wouldn’t have been better to BACK Bolelli @ 50 / LAY @ 25 rather than LAY Nadal 1.02 / BACK 1.04?
Risking £82, you would have netted a few quid more, £77.90 after the 5% commission.
Or am I missing something?
- MemphisFlash
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 10:12 pm
- Location: Leicester
i suppose in my defence and from a physcological point of view it seems easier to move 2 ticks from 1.02 to 1.04 rather than 15 ticks from 25 to 50.
- MemphisFlash
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 10:12 pm
- Location: Leicester
current state of play for that game.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
No need to defend yourself, I was suggesting that a back bet at 25 may not have been matched.MemphisFlash wrote: ↑Mon May 28, 2018 11:45 pmi suppose in my defence and from a physcological point of view it seems easier to move 2 ticks from 1.02 to 1.04 rather than 15 ticks from 25 to 50.
- northbound
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:22 pm
Good point there, Derek. I need to do some experiments in live markets.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:29 pm
Most amusing are the people that lay the leader regardless of price when rain rears it's head.. despite very often the price already being big or fair in many cases. Not always the case, but quite often recently.
- ShaunWhite
- Posts: 9731
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:42 am
I'd guessed south lincs, I'm nr Lincoln. Before the days of people moving around you could pin an accent down to a village round here, still can with the old-timers.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:29 pm
Feels like Cirstea about to throw in 10 unforced errors and throw the match away v Gavrilova.
Got down on herself when leading or level, which I will never understand. Not exactly cause to get upset.. Normal service resuming now she's losing.
Got down on herself when leading or level, which I will never understand. Not exactly cause to get upset.. Normal service resuming now she's losing.
Anyone on the Sharapova match?
A set and break up over 130K traded at 1.01, now shes a break down in the 3rd and in danger of being another shock exit!
A set and break up over 130K traded at 1.01, now shes a break down in the 3rd and in danger of being another shock exit!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Difficult to see on the charts but as I expected the final set of the Begu Vs Schmiedlo match resembled the earlier sets except for being on steroids!
at 5-5 that's me done with this one
Edit begu touched 1.02 then drifted out to 2.5ish moments later - as she broke and was then broke straight back, now at 6-6 and both players are trading around evens
Been an amazing match!
at 5-5 that's me done with this one
Edit begu touched 1.02 then drifted out to 2.5ish moments later - as she broke and was then broke straight back, now at 6-6 and both players are trading around evens
Been an amazing match!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.